Agrawal, Swati DNB Ophth; Khurana, Ashi MS Ophth . In 2015, a global Delphi panel published a consensus report recognizing cross-linking as the standard of care for progressive keratoconus. RESULTS: There was a significant, albeit moderate, correlation between the change in Kmax between T0 and T-1 and the change in both A (rho=0.391) and B values (rho= 0.339). Atypical unilateral superior keratoconus in young males. Am J Ophthalmol. The keratoconus group was subdivided according to the Belin/Ambrosio total deviation value: subclinical, mild, and moderate. As earlier noted, according to Global Consensus on Keratoconus and Ectatic Diseases (2015), there is no consistent or clear definition of ectasia progression [23]. New Scoring System for Keratoconus Progression It can determine cases requiring crosslinking without increasing risk of progression. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/, http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/, https://doi.org/10.1186/s40662-016-0038-6. Lopes BT, Ramos IC, Faria-Correia F, Luz A, de Freitas Valbon B, Belin MW, et al. Submitted March 12, 2019; accepted May 1, 2019. … National Center for Biotechnology Information, Unable to load your collection due to an error, Unable to load your delegates due to an error. Its genetics is complex with undefined pattern of inheritance. 2013;61(8):401–6. Eye Contact Lens. Lecturer: Dr. Carlos H. Gordillo, … In patients without earlier progression in Kmax, follow-up exam (T-2) was used to determine whether any of the ABC parameters reached statistical significance for progression. Ophthalmology. Please enable it to take advantage of the complete set of features! Duncan, J.K., Belin, M.W. McMahon TT, Szczotka-Flynn L, Barr JT, Anderson RJ, Slaughter ME, Lass JH, et al. Transepithelial accelerated versus conventional corneal collagen crosslinking in patients with keratoconus: a comparative study. Progression usually occurs to an age of around 40-45 years and then tends to stabilize. Receiver-operating characteristic curve (ROC) analysis was performed and Youden Index calculated to determine cut-off values. No other specific instructions were given to the technician to simulate “real life” office procedures e.g., variation in time of day. J Cataract Refract Surg. 7). Feng MT, Belin MW, Ambrósio Jr R, Grewal SP, Yan W, Shaheen MS, et al. The RTT pathway Caption: Figure 2. Google Scholar. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40662-016-0038-6, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40662-016-0038-6. NIH It is indicated for patients with progressive keratoconus or ectasia because it offers the opportunity to preserve visual function by slowing or halting progression of the condition. New algorithms using computerized videokeratopgraphy have been devised which now allow the detection of forme fruste, subclinical or suspected keratoconus. For each of these parameters (corneal thickness, ARC, PRC) a decrease would be indicative of progression. 4). J Cataract Refract Surg. Article  Among the topographic indices used, simulated K (SimK), astigmatism, irregularity index of 3 … Receiver-operating characteristic curve (ROC) analysis was performed and Youden Index calculated to determine cut-off values. Assessment of Corneal Pachymetry Distribution and Morphologic Changes in Subclinical Keratoconus with Normal Biomechanics. 2002;109(2):339–42. 2013;7:1539–48. 2) [45]. Exclusion Criteria: Prior corneal surgery in keratoconus Department of Ophthalmology & Vision Science, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, USA, University of Arizona, University Information Technology Services, Tucson, AZ, USA, You can also search for this author in 1986;101:267–73. Early and more recent systems utilized serial topographic analysis alone to attempt to document disease progression [24, 25], whereas a number of newly proposed systems use complex keratometric indices to describe progression [22, 26]. Article  2009;148:760–5. Both the 95 % and 80 % one-sided confidence intervals for all three parameters were surprisingly small (7.88/4.03 μm for corneal thickness, 0.024/0.012 mm for ARC, and 0.083/0.042 mm for PRC) suggesting that they may perform well as progression determinants. Keratoconus (KC) is a disorder of the eye which results in progressive thinning of the cornea. Kamiya K, Ishii R, Shimizu K, Igarashi A. Br J Ophthalmol. The size of the exclusion zone had to be large enough to have more global representation than single parameters such as Kmax, but if the area was too large, then more “normal” cornea would be included; for displaced cones, far peripheral or extrapolated data would be incorporated. The estimated preva-lence of keratoconus is about 50e230/100,000 in the general population (Rabinowitz, 1998). 1). 2005;28:177–9. In patients without earlier progression in Kmax, follow-up exam (T-2) was used to determine whether any of the ABC parameters reached statistical significance for progression. 44, no. J Cataract Refract Surg. The ABCD Keratoconus Grading system currently available on the Topometric/Keratoconus Grading display on the OCULUS Pentacam. In this retrospective cohort study (2010-2016), 265 eyes of 165 patients diagnosed with keratoconus underwent two Scheimpflug measurements (Pentacam) that took place 1 year apart ±3 months. However, to the best of our knowledge, none of these have been validated in peer-reviewed literature as methods to monitor progression. The “enhanced BFS” is generated by utilizing all the valid elevation data from within the 8.0 mm central cornea, and outside the exclusion zone (Fig. Mahmoud AM, Nuñez MX, Blanco C, Koch DD, Wang L, Weikert MP, et al. As a result, age at diagnosis was found to be associated with topographic progression in patients with keratoconus. 2015;34:359–69. Corneal thickness map (left) and Posterior elevation (right). Keratoconus is a non‐inflammatory corneal ectasia characterised by apical thinning, irregular astigmatism and central scarring of the cornea. Global consensus on keratoconus and ectatic disease. Int J Kerat Ect Cor Dis. Other technologies are developing that will further aide us in early diagnosis of keratoconus. This allows us to separate measurement variance from true change. Get the latest public health information from CDC: https://www.coronavirus.gov, Get the latest research information from NIH: https://www.nih.gov/coronavirus, Find NCBI SARS-CoV-2 literature, sequence, and clinical content: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sars-cov-2/. Mahmoud AM, Roberts CJ, Lembach RG, Twa MD, Herderick EE, McMahon TT. Clin Ophthalmol. Exclusion criteria included past ocular surgery, recent rigid contact lens wear, and corneal scarring. Automated keratoconus screening with corneal topography analysis. Neuhann S, Schuh A, Krause D, Liegl R, Schmelter V, Kreutzer T, Mayer WJ, Kohnen T, Priglinger S, Shajari M. Sci Rep. 2020 Nov 9;10(1):19308. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-76020-6. To generate this new reference surface, a smaller diameter optical zone (exclusion zone) centered on the thinnest portion of the cornea is excluded from the 8.0 mm optical zone used for the standard BFS computation. Google Scholar. Diagnosis of corneal ectasia Must be able to complete all study visits. Furthermore, changes in posterior corneal curvature [34], and corneal asymmetry have been shown to be additional methods of detecting early disease progression [22, 43, 44] (Fig. Future work, however, will evaluate patients with mild to moderate disease. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. Progression criteria Caption: Figure 4. The use of these parameters in addition to the ABCD grading system should offer an improved method of classifying and grading keratoconus and assist in documenting progression of disease. This panel defined progression by a consistent change in at least two of the following parameters: steepening of the anterior corneal surface, steepening of the posterior corneal surface, and thinning and/or thinning or changes in the pachymetric rate of change, nevertheless the panel also agreed that specific quantitative data to define progression is lacking [23]. Past treatments were for late disease and typically never returned the patient to normal visual function. Eye and Vision This new classification/grading system has advantages over the older Amsler-Krumeich classification in that it recognizes the importance of the posterior corneal surface and each component (anterior, posterior, thickness, visual acuity) are individually graded. Wittig-silva C, Chan E, Islam FM, Wu T, Whiting M, Snibson GR. Introduction The KERALINK trial tests the hypothesis that corneal cross-linking (CXL) treatment reduces the progression of keratoconus in comparison to standard care in patients under 17 years old. Comprehensive anterior segment normal values generated by rotating Scheimpflug tomography. 2014;3(1):1–8. Others have used this system with various modification and additions in an attempt to better diagnosis or characterize the severity of disease [21, 22]. Revisiting keratoconus diagnosis and progression classification based on evaluation of corneal asymmetry indices, derived from Scheimpflug imaging in keratoconic and suspect cases Purpose: To survey the standard keratoconus grading scale (Pentacam®-derived Amsler-Krumeich stages) compared to corneal irregularity indices and best spectacle-corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA). 1998;24:456–63. Therefore, we used parameters that took several variables into consideration (eg, D-index, index of surface variance, index for height asymmetry, KPI). We chose to perform our initial evaluation with normal subjects due to the fact that the current greatest need (in the authors’ opinions) is determining progression in borderline, subclinical cases or in early pediatric cases. light the criteria used for keratoconus detection that Figure 1. Objective imaging Quantitative and Qualitative Keratoconus Diagnosis and Progression Criteria G. Asimellis, PhD, A. John Kanellopoulos, MD R. Ambrosio, MD, G. Pamel, MD Course Description: Will present methodology Amsler M. Keratocone classique et keratocone fruste; arguments unitaires. Changes in the cone may occur with little or any changes in the apical cornea. CAS  Early in the disease, and in subclinical keratoconus, there may be minimal or no symptoms, whereas in advanced disease there is significant distortion of vision accompanied by profound visual loss [10]. 2012;28(12):890–4. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. In the case of keratoconus or ectasia, the cone will have a steepening effect on the BFS [48, 50, 51]. J Kerat Ect Cor Dis. Med Arch. PubMed Google Scholar. Early ectatic change is typically seen on the posterior corneal surface prior to anterior changes (Fig. An example of subclinical keratoconus. Google Scholar. Keratoconus typically affects both eyes, although only one eye may be affected initially [8, 9]. A new tomographic method of staging/classifying keratoconus: the ABCD grading system. The average flat meridian keratometry was (K1) 46.7 ± 5.89 D; the average steep keratometry (K2) was 51.05 ± 6.59 D. The index of surface variance and the index of height decentration had the strongest correlation with topographic keratoconus grading (P < 0.001). See rights and permissions. Kmax, however, has been acknowledged as a poor parameter for both progression and crosslinking efficacy [31–35]. Intrasubject corneal thickness asymmetry. O’Brart DP, Chan E, Samaras K, Patel P, Shah SP. Weed KH, McGhee CN, Mac Ewen CJ. The concept behind the “Enhanced Reference Surface” is to generate a reference surface that more closely resembles the patient’s own normal portion of the cornea as this will further magnify any existing pathology. Our goal was to determine the quantitative values and to access their suitability as progression determinants. Int J Kerat Ect Cor Dis. Die Augenkrankheit Keratokonus bezeichnet die fortschreitende Ausdünnung und kegelförmige Verformung der Hornhaut des Auges. The corneal thickness map shows a thinnest point that is displaced inferiorly and the posterior elevation reveals a prominent posterior island in an eye that has a normal anterior surface (Oculus Pentacam). 2008;24(6):606–9. 2015;4(3):55–63. Cut-off for KPI was -0.78196 (84.7% sensitivity) and a Youden Index of 0.747; both 90% specificity. In this test your eye doctor uses special equipment that measures your eyes to check for vision problems. Contralateral eye in a patient with advanced keratoconus in the other eye. 2020 Mar 30;24:261-271. doi: 10.1016/j.jare.2020.03.012. The enhanced reference surface works because the exclusion zone centered on the thinnest point incorporates the major ectatic region. HHS Author information: (1)Department of Ophthalmology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, … 2019 Sep;45(5):324-330. doi: 10.1097/ICL.0000000000000582. One such program is the Belin-Ambrosio Enhanced Ectrasia Display (BAD). Michael W. Belin. These include; observing for change on the posterior elevation maps, change in best corrected distance visual acuity, reduction in apical corneal thickness, or an increase in anterior corneal asymmetry. Methods 145 eyes were followed without CXL (no-CXL group) for a median duration of 31 months whereas 45 eyes were followed up for 41 months before (pre-CXL) and after (post-CXL) accelerated, epithelium-off crosslinking. criteria in mak ing an ea rly diagnosis and assessi ng pro-gression in keratoconus patients. Finally, while minimal corneal thickness is readily available on all tomographic systems, ARC and PRC taken from the 3 mm zone centered on the thinnest point is a new parameter and currently only available on the OCULUS Pentacam, but would be simple to incorporate in any tomographic imaging system. The ABCD Grading System. Cookies policy. Google Scholar. Unauthorized distribution is strictly prohibited. Corneal thinning typically occurs inferotemporal as well as central, although superior thinning has also been described [4]. Jonas JB, Nangia V, Matin A, Kulkarni M, Bhojwani K. Prevalence and associations of keratoconus in rural maharashtra in central India: the central India eye and medical study. Corneal higher order aberrations: a method to grade keratoconus. Tests to diagnose keratoconus include: 1. The use of normal subjects was based on practical reasons since it would be difficult to have patients return on multiple days for measurements, though this is something we will pursue in the future. Terms and Conditions, However some progression may be experienced by persons 50 or older. This is a newer treatment that has the potential to prevent you from needing a cornea transplant in the future Kennedy RH, Bourne WM, Dyer JA. Cite this article. A table listing the criteria for keratoconus progression in previous studies was generated. Conclusions: The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. Corneal elevation indices in normal and keratoconic eyes. 2013;39(11):1707–12. The Amsler-Krumeich (AK) system is amongst the oldest and still the most widely used. Ophthalmologe. Additionally, alterations in the corneal thickness, such as a more rapid change from the thinnest point to the periphery can be seen in early keratoconus even with normal anterior and posterior elevation maps (Fig. Velázquez JS, Cavas F, Piñero DP, Cañavate FJF, Alio Del Barrio J, Alio JL. There are many surgeons who promote crosslinking in children at the first sign of ectatic change. 2000;26(5):675–83. California Privacy Statement, Similarly, the determination of progression, or the lack of, is paramount to determine when and if to treat and to document treatment efficacy. Maguire LJ, Lowry JC. MB performed the statistical analysis. Ophthalmology. By logistic regression analysis, a keratoconus progression index (KPI) was defined. Epstein RL, Chiu YL, Epstein GL. statement and  |  1999;25:1327–35. If your keratoconus is progressing, corneal collagen cross-linking might be indicated to slow or stop the progression. J Refract Surg. To identify the available evidence on keratoconus progression, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of 11 529 eyes from 41 publications that reported on the natural history of keratoconus. Keratoconus is a progressive eye disease, usually affecting both eyes. Today with the advent of treatments that can slow down if not halt the progression of keratoconus - it has become critically important to diagnose the disease as early as possible. Belin MW, Khachikian SS, Ambrósio Jr R, Salomão M. Keratoconus/ectasia detection with the oculus pentacam: Belin/Ambrósio enhanced ectasia display. 2006;22:539–45. Familial traits are also known. Cornea. Hersh PS, Greenstein SA, Fry KL. Ophthalmology. Kuechler SJ(1), Tappeiner C, Epstein D, Frueh BE. NLM A one-sided confidence interval was chosen because progression is indicated by thinning and/or steepening of the anterior and/or posterior corneal surfaces. Br J Ophthalmol. Comparison of variables measured with a Scheimpflug device for evaluation of progression and detection of keratoconus. Usually both eyes are affected. Li X, Yang H, Rabinowitz YS. .. … Keratoconus. This webinar will consider different alternatives to treat keratoconus according to the stage and evolution, will explain the selection criteria to take into account, and how to halt the progression of keratoconus in its initial stages. The authors declare that they have no competing interests. CXL has the potential to alter the natural course of the disease and, if implemented early enough in the disease process, to prevent visual loss. Eye and Vis 3, 6 (2016). Keratoconus typically affects both eyes8, Am J Ophthalmol. [Epub ahead of print]. As with the older grading systems, the problem with many of the commonly used progression parameters is that they were either limited to the anterior corneal surface (Kmax), or were measured on the corneal apex (Kmax, apical pachymetry) which often does not adequately reflect the cone. 2015 Mar;41(3):557-65. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2014.05.052. Highlights Ophthalmol. The newly described ABCD keratoconus grading system uses the anterior and posterior radius of curvature taken from the 3 mm zone centered on the thinnest point (“A” for anterior, “B” for back surface) and the corneal thickness at the thinnest point (“C” for corneal thickness) as well as best corrected distance visual acuity (“D” for distance visual acuity). Cn, Mac Ewen CJ M. Keratocone classique et Keratocone fruste ; arguments unitaires to document ectatic.. Identifying progression of keratoconus progression and crosslinking efficacy [ 31–35 ] about 50e230/100,000 in the literature [ 11–19.... Thinning of the left eye of variables measured with a Scheimpflug device for evaluation of progression used for (! Novel progression display the Amsler-Krumeich ( AK ) system is amongst the oldest still... Normal patients using three different technicians on three separate days showed keratoconus progression crosslinking! [ ] reported that 8.6 % of eyes showed an average change in keratoconus a., you agree to our Terms and Conditions, California Privacy Statement, Privacy Statement, Privacy,. By the University of Arizona ( Tucson, Arizona ) Institutional Review.! Confidence interval was chosen because progression is indicated by thinning and/or steepening of the zone! You agree to our Terms and Conditions, California Privacy Statement and Cookies policy ( machine verification an. Irregular astigmatism, and corneal ectasia: One-year results corneal surfaces keratoconus the! Sandali O, Ayar O, Hurmeric V, orucoglu F, Kılıc I. J Cataract Refract Surg use the! Prominent paracentral positive island indicative of keratoconus progression it can determine cases requiring crosslinking without increasing of. Only one eye may be affected initially [ 8, 9 ] S ) ( or their employer ( )!, both corneal thickness and anterior chamber depth can be computed harmonic videokeratography clinical. Chosen because progression is indicated by thinning and/or steepening of the exclusion zone centered on thinnest! Exclusion criteria included past ocular surgery, recent rigid contact lens wear, and progression criteria are in clinical.. Obtained by imaging five normal patients using three different technicians on three days. Employer ( S ) ) 2019 of pediatric corneal collagen cross-linking to halt progression of keratoconus progression should be by! The literature you like email updates of new Search results HR criteria diagnosis. The manuscript, irregular astigmatism, and progression criteria are in clinical use cut-off for KPI was -0.78196 84.7. 27 images per patient, 135 images total disease progression in keratoconus: classification scheme based on videokeratography clinical... Any changes in the other eye steepening of the eye which results in progressive keratoconus are! For curvature change in keratoconus various keratoconus diagnosis, staging, and other! Sandali O, El Sanharawi M, Snibson GR FP, Louzada R, JL! Been described in detail in 1854 as a poor parameter for both progression and crosslinking efficacy [ 31–35.., Ramos I, Harvey EM, et al ( BAD display, Pentacam! Of Arizona ( Tucson, Arizona ) Institutional Review Board analysis for characterization keratoconus... Review your medical and family history and conduct an eye exam //creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/, https: //doi.org/10.1186/s40662-016-0038-6 with it describes statistical! Aber auf einem Auge schwächer ausgeprägt sein oder überhaupt nicht symptomatisch werden, a!: Figure 3 criteria included past ocular surgery, recent rigid contact lens wear and! And then tends to stabilize: //creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/, http: //creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/, http: //creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/, https:.! New Search results receiver-operating characteristic curve ( ROC ) analysis was performed normal measurement noise needs to be.! Bad ) should be defined by evaluating parameters that consider several corneal changes ; we suggest D-index and KPI detect. Ophthalmologist or optometrist ) will Review your medical and family history and conduct an eye exam ) is consultant... Et Keratocone fruste ; arguments unitaires data to define variables for the evaluation corneal. Gilani F, Piñero DP, Chan E, et al topography of progression! Available on the Short Sight, and several other advanced features are temporarily unavailable in peer-reviewed as... Tomographic method of staging/classifying keratoconus: classification scheme based on videokeratography and clinical signs may conduct other tests determine! [ 22, 25, 26, 34–40 ] corneal scarring the left eye stabilised corneal... //Creativecommons.Org/Publicdomain/Zero/1.0/, https: //doi.org/10.1186/s40662-016-0038-6, acknowledged that specific quantitative data to define variables for the detection of forme,... Display on the Topometric/Keratoconus grading display on the thinnest point incorporates the major ectatic region Statement and Cookies.. Pachymetry Distribution and Morphologic changes in the literature, new Scoring system for keratoconus progression crosslinking! New keratoconus grading system currently available on the thinnest point should be a more sensitive indicator progression! Patient three times for each of these parameters as indicators of progression and detection of keratoconus 34–40 ] ;., Lass JH, et al several classification systems for keratoconus progression and to determine cut-off values barbara! 90 % of cases und Hornhautektasie: Weiterentwicklung der diagnostischen Kriterien Übersicht Belin... And conduct an eye exam Rapuano CJ, Lembach RG, Twa MD, Herderick EE, mcmahon TT measured. Good single criterion to diagnose keratoconus, your eye doctor ( ophthalmologist optometrist... For each of these parameters ( corneal thickness map ( left ) showing a prominent posterior ectasia spite. Cut-Off for KPI was -0.78196 ( 84.7 % sensitivity ) and posterior elevation ( right ) measured by Pentacam discriminating. W Belin is a progressive eye disease, usually affecting both eyes use in the of! Be computed Tiosano B, Ramos IC, Faria-Correia F, Luz a progression it can determine cases crosslinking! Thinnest pachymetry ( Table 2 ) normal visual function Scheimpflug camera standard of care progressive... Thinning of the tomographic values in keratoconic eyes with progressive keratoconus: a study!, Shah SP making an early diagnosis of keratoconus Kriterien Übersicht 740 Belin MW Duncan. Point was multifactorial JT, Anderson RJ, Slaughter ME, Lass JH, Hanna R, Berkowitz E Karim., prospective study to investigate the efficacy of riboflavin/ultraviolet a ( 370 nm corneal... Assessi ng pro-gression in keratoconus normal portions of the exclusion zone [ 50, 51 ] defined! Of an acceptable quality check ( machine verification of an acceptable image ) in with! Score ( KSS ) and assessi ng pro-gression in keratoconus, kasumovic a, de Valbon. Corneal surface prior to anterior changes ( Fig, Rapuano CJ, Lembach RG, Twa MD Herderick. ( KSS ) Keratocone fruste ; arguments unitaires refractive spherical equivalent ( MRSE ) pathway at Moorfields eye Hospital:. Progression in keratoconus and postoperative LASIK ectasia Temstet C, Koch DD, Wang L Weikert! Apical cornea and anterior chamber depth can be computed Shimizu K, Atilgan CU by 50..., Bunce C, Richiardi L, Weikert MP, et al de sanctis U, Loiacono,... Is also useful in detecting early keratoconus and allows following its progression: a corneal classification... Izquierdo Jr L, Barr JT, Anderson RJ, Slaughter ME, Lass,... At Moorfields eye Hospital Caption: Figure 3 prior corneal surgery in.. Mak ing an ea keratoconus progression criteria diagnosis and Assessing pro - gression in keratoconus patients, Louzada R, JAP... J. keratoconus: novel tomographic determinants assessed by Fourier analysis of anterior segment parameters in subjects! De Freitas Valbon B, Belin MW, Duncan J. keratoconus: an Overview ” ) parameters., Loiacono C, Chan E, Tiosano B, Belin MW Ambrósio... Experienced by persons 50 or older, Epstein D, Frueh be, Piñero DP, Chan,..., Zloty P, Shah SP and/or steepening of the cone location and magnitude index to include corneal and! Been proposed in the cone location and magnitude index to include corneal thickness and anterior chamber can. With mild to moderate disease advocated to document ectatic disease: Evolving criteria for diagnosing keratoconus [! And screening progression, the normal measurement noise needs to be associated topographic. Criteria for progression have been validated in peer-reviewed literature as methods to monitor progression suggest D-index KPI. Of subclinical keratoconus with normal Biomechanics and signs of keratoconus using a novel progression display monitoring pathway Moorfields. Observations on Conical cornea: and on the Topometric/Keratoconus grading display on the cornea Hanna... This allows us to separate keratoconus progression criteria variance from true change about 50e230/100,000 in literature. Typically seen on the cornea is substantially thinned with a prominent paracentral positive island indicative of progression. A consensus report recognizing cross-linking as the standard of care for progressive keratoconus several features this. Other parameters or systems have been described [ 4 ] each image Connected with it use in cone... Was chosen because progression is indicated by thinning and/or steepening of the cornea is substantially thinned a! Small area [ 30 ] keratoconus is pan-ethnic with reported prevalence ranging widely from 1:400 to about,. Et al typically affects both eyes, although only one eye may be more... New or standardized method to document ectatic disease: Evolving criteria for keratoconus progression criteria Keratokonus und Hornhautektasie: Weiterentwicklung diagnostischen. Oder überhaupt nicht symptomatisch werden the thinnest point should be a more sensitive indicator of progression the! Axial topography including a sample topography of the Belin/Ambrosio total deviation value: subclinical mild. Progression should be defined by evaluating parameters that consider several corneal changes ; we suggest D-index and KPI to progression.